PEX A vs. PEX B
We now offer financing. Call for details: 678-386-7513
PEX A vs. PEX B: Pros, Cons, and Interior Diameter Differences for Home Repiping
When repiping your home, two of the most common options are PEX A and PEX B. Both are types of cross-linked polyethylene pipe, but they differ in manufacturing methods, performance, flexibility—and importantly—interior diameter.
PEX-A (Engel Method / Peroxide Cross-linking)
Pros:
- Superior Flexibility: PEX-A is the most flexible, ideal for retrofits and tight spaces.
- Cold Expansion Fittings: Uses expansion fittings (e.g., Uponor), which allow the pipe to expand over the fitting and then shrink tight, creating a highly secure seal.
- Freeze Resistance: Less likely to crack if frozen due to flexibility.
- Shape Memory: Recovers from kinks when heat is applied—no need to cut out damaged sections.
- Larger Interior Diameter: Expansion fittings fit inside the pipe, preserving the full bore. This gives PEX-A slightly better flow capacity compared to PEX-B with crimp-style fittings.
Cons:
- Higher Cost: PEX-A is typically 25–35% more expensive than PEX-B.
- Less Widely Available: Not as common in hardware stores.
- Slightly Lower Burst Pressure: Though still more than adequate for residential use.
PEX-B (Silane Method / Moisture Cure)
Pros:
- Cost-Effective: Significantly cheaper than PEX-A, great for large-scale repiping.
- Stiffer Structure: Holds straight runs better; ideal for slab or open-wall installations.
- High Burst Strength: Excellent resistance to pressure, especially at higher temps.
- Widespread Availability: Common in most hardware stores.
Cons:
- Less Flexible: More difficult to route through tight corners or around obstructions.
- Kinks Are Permanent: Damaged sections typically need to be cut and replaced.
- Crimp or Clamp Fittings Only: These fit around the pipe, slightly reducing interior diameter and thus reducing flow marginally.
- Reduced Flow Capacity: Because the fittings go over the pipe, PEX-B typically has a smaller effective interior diameter than PEX-A of the same nominal size.
Interior Diameter Differences
Nominal Size | PEX-A (Expansion Fitting ID) | PEX-B (Crimp Fitting ID) |
---|---|---|
1/2″ | ~0.475″ | ~0.435″ |
3/4″ | ~0.681″ | ~0.625″ |
1″ | ~0.875″ | ~0.860″ |
Note: Differences depend on the brand and fitting type, but in general, PEX-A allows for slightly better flow rates at a given size due to larger interior diameters when using expansion fittings.
Summary Table
Feature | PEX-A | PEX-B |
---|---|---|
Flexibility | Excellent | Moderate |
Freeze Resistance | High | Moderate |
Cost | Higher | Lower |
Fitting Type | Expansion (internal) | Crimp/Clamp (external) |
Interior Diameter | Larger (better flow) | Smaller (reduced flow) |
Kink Repair | Heat-repairable | Cut and replace |
Pressure Resistance | Slightly lower | Higher |
Availability | Moderate | High |
Which One Is Best for Your Home?
- Choose PEX-A if:
- You want the most flexible, freeze-resistant option.
- You’re using a system like Uponor with expansion fittings.
- Slightly better flow performance is a priority.
- Choose PEX-B if:
- You’re on a tighter budget.
- You’re working with straight runs or new construction.
- Your contractor uses crimp-style tools and fittings.